🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations produced results, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to resume talks with the Trump administration. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, EU nations employed their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting consistent overtures from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a controlling nation that misuses the idea of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by military means. He stated the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and continues the primary solution to address disputes, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and respect, they will get a response in the equivalent tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to break. The nation of Iran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."